New York Magazine · David Freedlander ·

How Alex Bores' Who Decides seeks to make AI safety a standard Democratic position, like being pro-choice, in 2028, as tech-funded rivals vie for influence

In early November, in that exceedingly brief window between the midterm election and presidential-primary season …

In this story Alex Bores Who Decides

How Alex Bores' Who Decides seeks to make AI safety a standard Democratic position, like being pro-choice, in 2028, as tech-funded rivals vie for influence

Lead Source

New York Magazine — How Alex Bores' Who Decides seeks to make AI safety a standard Democratic position, like being pro-choice, in 2028, as tech-funded rivals vie for influence ↗

How this story grew

Coverage · 0 Discussion · 0

Nov 3Nov 4

Discussion

Related stories

New York Times: New York State Assemblyman Alex Bores launches Who Decides, a nonprofit that raised $10M and aims to raise another $20M in 2027 to shape Democratic AI policy

New York Times: How Dario Amodei's AI safety essays help explain some AI fears; his regulatory stance has shifted from wariness in January to calling for third-party evaluators

Axios: OpenAI plans a post-midterms policy and PR blitz, pushing mandatory "speed limits" for powerful AI and rebranding its data centers as "AI compute campuses"

LessWrong: A look at AI safety debates and the rising popularity of "Stop Unilaterally + Raise Awareness", or SURA; safety-focused AI labs shouldn't abandon the AI race

Business Insider: Sam Altman says AI could end up controlled by a few powerful players, partly because AI fears could push people to trade "a lot of liberty for safety"

Discuss with AI

ChatGPT ↗ Claude ↗

← Back to TechSnif