LessWrong · Scott Alexander ·

A look at AI safety debates and the rising popularity of "Stop Unilaterally + Raise Awareness", or SURA; safety-focused AI labs shouldn't abandon the AI race

The AI Futures Project[1] distinguishes several different plans for navigating the AI transition, which I'll lump into two broader categories:

A look at AI safety debates and the rising popularity of "Stop Unilaterally + Raise Awareness", or SURA; safety-focused AI labs shouldn't abandon the AI race

Lead Source

LessWrong — A look at AI safety debates and the rising popularity of "Stop Unilaterally + Raise Awareness", or SURA; safety-focused AI labs shouldn't abandon the AI race ↗

How this story grew

Coverage · 0 Discussion · 0

Nov 2Nov 3

More

Don't Worry About the Vase: Don't Worry About the Vase

Discussion

@boazbaraktcs @benthamsbulldog @danwilliamsphil @repligate @charliebull0ck @jessi_cata @sashagusevposts @ryan_kidd44 @jam3scampbell @atrembath

Related stories

The Verge: A look at AI safety groups METR, Redwood Research, and Apollo Research, as AI misalignment incidents at OpenAI and Anthropic thrust them into the spotlight

Bloomberg: Q&A with Mustafa Suleyman on AI safety incidents, risks of removing guardrails while testing 10x-larger future models, a cross-industry safety body, and more

New York Times: How Dario Amodei's AI safety essays help explain some AI fears; his regulatory stance has shifted from wariness in January to calling for third-party evaluators

A Few Thoughts on Cryptographic Engineering: A look at two opposing perspectives on AI agent sandboxing: infosec says labs need better containment while AI alignment says sandboxes cannot contain agents

The Atlantic: David Robinson, ex-OpenAI safety and policy: SV lacks a safety-centric culture; labs must study other fields' safety approaches; time for trial and error's over

Discuss with AI

ChatGPT ↗ Claude ↗

← Back to TechSnif