New York Times ·

US affidavit: the man charged with attacking Sam Altman's home had a document that "identified views opposed" to AI and included other AI executives' addresses

The authorities said a 20-year-old Texas man charged with throwing a homemade bomb at the gate of Sam Altman's home …

In this story Sam Altman
US affidavit: the man charged with attacking Sam Altman's home had a document that "identified views opposed" to AI and included other AI executives' addresses

Lead Source

Coverage

More

US Department of Justice: US Department of Justice
ABC7: ABC7
Fox News: Fox News
CNN: CNN
New York Post: New York Post
The Economic Times: The Economic Times
CNBC: CNBC
Breitbart: Breitbart
San Francisco Examiner: San Francisco Examiner
Advocate: Advocate
Fortune: Fortune
San Francisco Chronicle: San Francisco Chronicle
The Daily Caller: The Daily Caller
The San Francisco Standard: The San Francisco Standard
Sources: Sources
@jasmine's substack: @jasmine's substack
Reuters: Reuters
Forbes: Forbes
Washington Post: Washington Post

Discussion

TechSnif Coverage

Altman Home Attacker Had Document Listing AI Exec Addresses

A 20-year-old Texas man who bombed Altman's gate had a document with anti-AI views and addresses of other AI executives.

A 20-year-old Texas man charged with throwing a homemade bomb at the gate of OpenAI CEO Sam Altman's home had more than just a grudge. According to a US affidavit, he possessed a document that "identified views opposed" to AI and listed addresses of other AI executives.

Federal authorities revealed the details as part of their case against the suspect. The document suggests the attack wasn't a random act — it was connected to broader anti-AI sentiment and awareness of multiple targets in the industry.

The bomb targeted Altman's gate specifically. No further details about the other executives named in the document or whether they've been notified have been disclosed in the source reporting.

The case raises serious questions about physical security for prominent AI industry figures as the technology continues to generate intense public debate.