The White House and Anthropic are working on a framework that would assess the severity of AI security flaws, a sign that negotiations are progressing
The attempt to create a standardized method to evaluate this and future such incidents underscores how the administration is racing …
Lead Source
How this story grew
Coverage
More
Discussion
TechSnif Coverage
White House and Anthropic Building AI Security Flaw Rating System
The two are developing a standardized framework to assess the severity of AI security vulnerabilities.
The White House and Anthropic are quietly hammering out a framework designed to grade the severity of AI security flaws. Think: a standardized scoring system for when things go wrong with AI models.
The collaboration signals that negotiations between the administration and the AI company are gaining real traction. It also reveals how urgently the government wants a repeatable playbook for evaluating AI security incidents — not just the current ones, but whatever comes next.
The effort essentially aims to create a common language for assessing AI vulnerabilities. Right now, there's no widely accepted method to gauge how bad a given AI security flaw actually is. That's a problem when you're trying to coordinate responses across government and industry.
No details yet on timelines or specific criteria. But the fact that these talks are happening at all is notable.