Bloomberg · Mishal Husain ·

Q&A with Signal's Meredith Whittaker on why online child safety efforts risk mass surveillance, leaving the markets that demand weakening of encryption, more

Meredith Whittaker has spent years arguing that privacy is a prerequisite for a free society.

Q&A with Signal's Meredith Whittaker on why online child safety efforts risk mass surveillance, leaving the markets that demand weakening of encryption, more

Lead Source

How this story grew

Coverage · 0 Discussion · 0
Jun 20Jun 22

More

TechCrunch: TechCrunch
The Next Web: The Next Web
Bloomberg Podcasts on YouTube: Bloomberg Podcasts on YouTube

Discussion

TechSnif Coverage

Signal's Whittaker: Child Safety Push Risks Mass Surveillance

Signal's Meredith Whittaker argues online child safety efforts risk enabling mass surveillance and weakening encryption.

Meredith Whittaker of Signal is pushing back hard against online child safety initiatives she says risk opening the door to mass surveillance. In a Bloomberg Q&A, Whittaker laid out her case that privacy isn't optional — it's foundational to a free society.

The core tension: governments pushing child safety measures that would require weakening encryption. Whittaker has signaled willingness to leave markets that demand exactly that. No compromise on the math that keeps messages private.

It's a familiar battle line. Policymakers frame it as protecting kids. Privacy advocates frame it as gutting the security infrastructure that protects everyone. Whittaker has spent years on this fight and shows no signs of backing down.

Signal remains one of the few major platforms drawing a hard line on end-to-end encryption, refusing to build in backdoors regardless of political pressure.