The Register · Thomas Claburn ·

Nature publishes a peer-reviewed paper alleging that Microsoft's 2025 quantum breakthrough claims were based on "basic Python errors" and data cherry-picking

Nature paper argues researchers cherry-picked data. Redmond insists its work is sound

Nature publishes a peer-reviewed paper alleging that Microsoft's 2025 quantum breakthrough claims were based on "basic Python errors" and data cherry-picking

Lead Source

More

Reuters: Reuters
Nature: Nature
Scientific American: Scientific American
Nature: Nature
BBC: BBC
The Verge: The Verge
Decrypt: Decrypt
Neowin: Neowin

Discussion

TechSnif Coverage

Microsoft's Quantum Breakthrough Hit With Python Error Allegations

A Nature paper claims Microsoft's 2025 quantum milestone was built on coding mistakes and cherry-picked data.

Microsoft's celebrated 2025 quantum computing breakthrough is under serious fire. A peer-reviewed paper published in Nature alleges the company's landmark claims were undermined by "basic Python errors" and selective data presentation.

The researchers behind the critique argue Microsoft's team cherry-picked data to support their conclusions — a damning accusation in any scientific field, let alone one attracting billions in investment.

Microsoft isn't backing down. The company insists its original work is sound and stands by its findings.

The dispute strikes at the heart of quantum computing's credibility problem. Tech giants have been racing to demonstrate quantum advantage, and Microsoft's 2025 announcement was seen as a major milestone. If the critique holds up, it could set back confidence in corporate quantum research claims significantly.

The full peer-reviewed rebuttal is now available through Nature.