Engadget · Daniel Cooper ·

HTC Vive Eagle smart glasses review: useful controls, lightweight, and focused on privacy, but inessential, too expensive at $499+, and imaging needs to improve

HTC can't win on price, and can't win on the arguments. … Meta makes so much money that it can burn billions upon billions …

In this story HTC Vive Eagle

HTC Vive Eagle smart glasses review: useful controls, lightweight, and focused on privacy, but inessential, too expensive at $499+, and imaging needs to improve

Lead Source

Engadget — HTC Vive Eagle smart glasses review: useful controls, lightweight, and focused on privacy, but inessential, too expensive at $499+, and imaging needs to improve ↗

How this story grew

Coverage · 0 Discussion · 0

Sep 15Sep 16

Related stories

Bloomberg: Hands-on with Snap's Specs: more advanced than Meta's top-end glasses, fully untethered, mostly comfortable, navigation works well, but design has compromises

Bloomberg: HTC rolls out its $499 Vive Eagle smart glasses, which let users choose between Gemini or ChatGPT as their assistant, in North America, Europe, and Australia

The Verge: Google Pixel 11 review: a great design, fantastic camera features, and some Pro phone specs, but few gen-to-gen hardware improvements and it's expensive at $899

Wall Street Journal: A look at Snap's bet on Specs AR glasses; sources say Evan Spiegel wore them for an interview against internal advice, and planned outside funding never came

The Information: Meta plans to release a camera-free pair of smart glasses this fall; the new model has six mics to let users speak with Meta's AI chatbot and Muse

Discuss with AI

ChatGPT ↗ Claude ↗

← Back to TechSnif